Start with a defensible question, not another dashboard.
Each question sets the season, team and player context for you and opens the nearest evidence surface. They never manufacture pressure, spacing, role or causal evidence that the current data tier does not contain.
CURRENT TARGETNo competition selectedCompetition-wide question
Choose a competition season, then launch a question.
Tier 1+
Protecting late leads
When leading after 75′, what changes in the evidence we can observe?
Carry a late-game leading-state question from season context into individual matches and coaching review.
Supported nowTier 1 can compare chance volume, xG and chance quality in selected matches/windows where that detail exists.
Requires richer evidenceEvent/tracking evidence before attributing change to compactness, line height, pressing shape or spacing.
Tier 2+
Defensive transition protection
What deserves review immediately after losing the ball?
Frame the turnover question explicitly without treating a resulting chance as proof of the mechanism that caused it.
Supported nowMatch evidence can identify dangerous chances worth reviewing and preserve a defensive-transition context.
Requires richer evidenceTier 2 event phases to identify ball-loss chains; tracking/CV for rest-defense spacing and off-ball occupation.
Tier 2–3
Build-up vs aggressive pressure
Where does progression break down when the opponent presses aggressively?
Start an on-ball investigation while keeping pressure itself an evidence requirement rather than an assumed filter.
Supported nowTeam/match context and on-ball intent can be preserved; Tier 2 passing/action feeds can support progression analysis when available.
Requires richer evidenceProvider pressure events or tracking/CV before claiming true pressure geometry, occupation or line spacing.
Tier 1
Chance quality profile
Is the team creating more chances, better chances, or both?
Move from league-relative attacking output into chance-level match evidence without inventing a tactical mechanism.
Requires richer evidenceRicher event/video evidence to explain how the chances were created.
Tier 1
Player output in team context
How does this player's production compare with the relevant position cohort?
Open a canonical player environment while retaining team and season context for evidence drill-down.
Supported nowProvider-backed season statistics, minutes eligibility and position-cohort percentile/rank evidence.
Requires richer evidenceRole/stint evidence before treating statistical similarity as functional-role equivalence.
Tier 1+
Chasing the match
When trailing late, does chance production actually change?
Preserve a trailing-state late window before moving into specific matches and forming tactical explanations.
Supported nowTier 1 can show xG pressure and chance-quality changes in covered match evidence.
Requires richer evidenceEvent/video evidence for substitution, formation, territory or pressing explanations.
Methodological ruleA template creates analytical context only. Observed evidence, deterministic derivations, interpretations and coaching actions remain separate provenance objects. Applying a question does not upgrade the evidence tier.